Tips for ABINIT users and developers

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
beauty:2018

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
beauty:2018 [2018/06/03 23:10] – [What should be done ?] Xavier Gonzebeauty:2018 [2018/06/03 23:11] (current) – [What should be done ?] Xavier Gonze
Line 29: Line 29:
  
   * A. There are still MANY isolated bibliographical references in the descriptions of input variables or lessons of the tutorial (or other files), [[https://docs.abinit.org/developers/abimkdocs/#how-to-add-a-bibliographic-reference|to be ported inside the bibliography database]].   * A. There are still MANY isolated bibliographical references in the descriptions of input variables or lessons of the tutorial (or other files), [[https://docs.abinit.org/developers/abimkdocs/#how-to-add-a-bibliographic-reference|to be ported inside the bibliography database]].
-  * B. Many line breaks have disappeared in the input variable descriptions (so, suppressing paragraphs)+  * B. Many line breaks have disappeared in the input variable descriptions (so, one big paragraph appears instead of several paragraphs)
   * C. Equations might still be in "text" style, while [[https://docs.abinit.org/developers/markdown/#mathjax|they should be now in "LaTex" style]] (interpreted using MathJax)   * C. Equations might still be in "text" style, while [[https://docs.abinit.org/developers/markdown/#mathjax|they should be now in "LaTex" style]] (interpreted using MathJax)
   * D. Specific improvements of lessons of the tutorials and other files could be made, thanks to the new mkdocs infrastructure.   * D. Specific improvements of lessons of the tutorials and other files could be made, thanks to the new mkdocs infrastructure.
beauty/2018.1528060247.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/06/03 23:10 by Xavier Gonze